Skip to content
Careers
Amax Marketing
Services / PPC

Paid ads that pay back.

Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn and Microsoft Ads, built around CPA and ROAS, not clicks or impressions. Fixed management fee. No ad-spend mark-up.

5.0Rated on Google10+ yearsSenior team, no hand-offs
  • Aerospheres
  • Connect Vending
  • Interfood Technology
  • Exclaimer
  • Standby Self Storage
  • Orange Box
  • Burnt Oak Builders Merchants
  • Happy Tree Academy
  • Container Self Store
  • Mid Wales Storage
  • 24 Pure Water
  • Quickfit
  • Amax Fire & Security
  • Amax Supplies
  • Scentsational
  • Bare Ice
  • Grow My Wellbeing
  • Kinnovis
  • NADC
  • Wigwam Storage
  • Triple Eight
  • BES Group
Why PPC, when to use it

The lever you pull for speed.

SEO compounds slowly. PPC moves now. Most clients need both.

Paid search captures demand that already exists. Someone Googling "self storage near me" is at the bottom of the funnel, they want a unit, today, close to them. Miss that moment and a competitor gets the booking. Google Ads is how you buy that moment while your SEO catches up.

The problem is that most agencies run PPC badly. Cost-per-click inflation in competitive UK sectors, legal, dental, self-storage, construction, has been relentless for the last 5 years. A £3 click in 2020 is £8 in 2026. That's only profitable if your account is built right: tight geo-targeting, proper negative keywords, landing pages that convert, conversion tracking that actually measures revenue not form-fills.

Get any one of those wrong and you're lighting money on fire. Which is why 60% of the accounts we audit have at least one of: no negative keyword strategy, broad-match where it shouldn't be, conversion tracking measuring the wrong thing, or ads pointing at the homepage instead of a dedicated landing page.

Done well, paid search can also be genuinely creative. These five PPC advertising examples show what happens when a campaign breaks the mould instead of following it.

Why our PPC pricing is different

Most agencies charge a percentage of your ad spend, usually 10-20%. That creates a perverse incentive: they earn more when your ad spend goes up, regardless of whether your cost-per-acquisition improves. We charge a fixed monthly management fee instead, so our incentive is aligned with yours: we want your CPA down, not your spend up. It's a small structural change that changes everything.

What's in PPC

Everything that moves the needle.

G

Google Search + Shopping

Intent-driven campaigns with manual match-type control, negative keyword pruning, and shopping feeds that actually work.

M

Meta (Facebook + Instagram)

Full-funnel prospecting → retargeting → retention, with creative testing built in.

L

LinkedIn Ads

B2B lead-gen with account-based targeting and lead forms tuned for qualified enquiries.

↗

Conversion tracking

Proper GA4 + server-side tagging. You actually know what ads are driving what revenue, not "assumed conversions".

◎

Landing pages

Dedicated pages for every major campaign theme, not dumping ad traffic onto your homepage and hoping.

£

Budget transparency

Fixed management fee. Your ad spend goes to the platform directly. We don't touch it and don't mark it up.

Problems we fix

Sound familiar?

Problem

"Our cost-per-lead is creeping up every month."

Fix

Usually: broad-match keywords bleeding money, no negative keyword lists, or landing pages that haven't been optimised in 18 months. We audit the account, prune the waste, and rebuild the landing pages. Results vary by account and sector, so we measure in quarters rather than weeks.

Problem

"We don't actually know which campaigns drive revenue."

Fix

Conversion tracking is either missing, double-counting, or set up to measure form-submissions, not actual sales. We fix tracking properly (server-side where needed, offline conversion import for phone/in-person bookings).

Problem

"Performance Max feels like a black box."

Fix

Because it is one. We run PMax where it fits (ecom) and refuse to run it where it doesn't (B2B lead-gen, complex sales cycles). Where it runs, we use asset-group segmentation and exclusions to claw back control Google tries to take.

Problem

"Our old agency wanted us to spend £10k/month minimum."

Fix

Most UK businesses need £1,500 to £4,000/month ad spend to start seeing real results. £10k is what big agencies need to justify their retainer structure, not what the campaign needs. We'll quote based on what the account needs, not what we need.

Problem

"Every click costs more than we make."

Fix

Either the keyword mix is wrong (too broad, too top-funnel) or the landing page isn't converting. Sometimes the maths just doesn't work in a sector and we'll tell you that, paid search isn't right for everyone, at every budget.

Problem

"We can't tell if Meta is working or not."

Fix

Post-iOS14 attribution is genuinely broken in Meta Ads Manager. We fix it with a combination of server-side events, CAPI integration, and post-purchase surveys, standard now for anyone serious about paid social.

How we work

A clear process. No black boxes.

  1. 01

    Account audit

    Review of existing accounts (if any), competitor activity, historic data, and conversion setup.

  2. 02

    Build + test

    Campaign structure, creative, landing pages. Small-budget tests first to validate before scaling.

  3. 03

    Scale

    What works gets bigger budgets. What doesn't gets paused fast. No sentimental spend.

  4. 04

    Optimise

    Weekly check-ins, monthly strategic reviews, quarterly channel-mix rebalancing.

How we compare

Fixed fee changes behaviour.

Most PPC agencies
  • Charge 10-20% of ad spend as management fee
  • Benefit when your ad spend increases
  • Recommend higher budgets to unlock "scale"
  • Obscure performance behind impressions/clicks metrics
  • Let PMax run on autopilot because it's less work
  • Run the same account structure for every client
How Amax runs PPC
  • Fixed monthly management fee, quoted per account complexity
  • Our incentive is your CPA down, not your spend up
  • Recommend budget cuts when the maths doesn't work
  • Report on CPA, ROAS, qualified leads, and revenue, nothing else
  • Use PMax where it fits, refuse it where it doesn't
  • Every account structure is designed around your sector and goals
Our commitments

Aligned incentives. Transparent reporting.

We earn from doing the job well, not from spending more of your money. Structural alignment, not sales patter.

Fixed management fee, not % of ad spend

Your incentive is your cost-per-acquisition down. With a % of spend model, your agency's incentive is your ad spend up. We use fixed fee so those incentives line up.

No mark-up on ad spend

Your ad budget goes directly to Google, Meta, LinkedIn. We don't touch it, don't process it, don't mark it up. You see exactly what was spent and where.

You own the ad accounts

We run ads on your accounts, not shared agency accounts. If we part ways, you keep every campaign, every conversion event, every creative asset, every audience.

Proper conversion tracking as standard

Server-side tagging, GA4 events, CAPI integration, offline conversion import, all set up during onboarding. No 'assumed conversions' or guesswork.

Weekly check-ins, monthly strategic review

Weekly pulse for operational adjustments. Monthly strategic session for channel mix, creative direction, budget re-allocation. Quarterly for wider market context.

PPC FAQ

You're probably wondering…

Can't find what you need? Ask us directly.

A well-run PPC advertising campaign is built around tight ad groups, constant negative-keyword pruning, landing pages matched to search intent, and a fixed-fee structure so our incentives match yours. We report on cost per acquisition, not vanity click metrics.
Because a % of ad spend model encourages agencies to spend more of your money, not better. Fixed fee means our incentive is aligned with your outcomes. We want your cost per acquisition down, not up.
It depends entirely on sector and goals. We'll happily tell you if your budget won't move the needle rather than take a retainer that can't deliver.
First meaningful data in week 2. First optimisations by week 3. Consistent performance improvement over the first 3 months as we test, learn, and scale winners.
Yes, LinkedIn for B2B, YouTube for the right consumer categories, Microsoft Ads (Bing) where it pencils. We'll recommend the channel mix that makes sense for your goals, not a one-size-fits-all package.
Yes, GA4, GTM, server-side tagging, CAPI, offline conversion import. Proper tracking is half the battle in modern paid media and we don't skip it.
Yes, where it fits. PMax is strong for retail/ecom with good product feeds. For B2B lead-gen and complex service businesses, standard Search + targeted Display usually outperforms PMax significantly.
Depends what we find in the audit. If the structure is workable, we optimise. If it's fundamentally broken, we rebuild, keeping the historic data for conversion modelling.
Cost per lead can rise when we remove cheap but low-quality conversions, or when a test spends budget before it has proved itself. Our own Amax Fire & Security account showed both: once we cleared out junk conversions it recorded fewer enquiries, but they were real ones.
A conversion recorded in Google Ads that is not a genuine potential customer, for example someone looking for a different product, a job, or support. Junk conversions make a report look good and cost real money, so we filter them out even when it makes the headline numbers worse.
Because the numbers are small. One of our accounts recorded 3, 7 and 5 enquiries in consecutive months on almost identical spend, and the quarter landed exactly where its trend predicted. One extra enquiry is a big percentage change, so we read quarters rather than single months.
You will see early data within weeks and a clearer picture over a quarter. A first month is an early read, not a benchmark: one new account produced 12 conversions in its first month and we treated that as a starting point, not a result.
We stop it and tell you. On one account we gave a new campaign its own budget to see whether a set of searches could work. It spent £556 for less than one conversion, so we paused it after two months and said so plainly in the report.
No, and be wary of anyone who does before seeing your account. Sector, budget and search demand all change what is achievable. What we commit to is reporting what actually happened, in plain English, including the parts that did not work.
Talk to us

Ready to get seen?

Trade 10 minutes for a free audit. A real human, usually Rahul, replies within one working day.

Client words

What clients actually say.

Unedited, straight from Google. Want results your customers talk about?

Book a discovery call
Free audit + concept

PPC results

Three live accounts. The good and the awkward.

These are accounts we run for businesses in the Amax group, so we can show them in full. The enquiry counts are small, which means single months swing a lot. We report what happened, including the tests that failed.

Amax Supplies

IT hardware supplier

B2B · Google Search · Q2 vs Q3 2026

24 → 19Conversions, Q2 to Q3
£63 → £101Cost per conversion (£63.32 to £100.93)
  • We gave conference-room searches their own campaign and budget as a test. It took £556, 29% of the quarter’s spend, for less than one conversion, so we paused it in September.
  • The original campaign delivered about 18 of the quarter’s 19 conversions at £74.26 each.
  • Some of Q2’s conversions were phone enquiries, not the business the client wanted, so Q2 flatters the comparison.

Cost per conversion rose, and most of the rise is the test we stopped.

Amax Fire & Security

Commercial fire, CCTV and access control

London · Google Search · Q2 vs Q3 2026

35 → 15Conversions, Q2 to Q3
£258Cost per enquiry on the rebuilt campaigns, level with £257.50 before
  • In May we stopped the old campaigns because they were recording junk conversions. 25 of Q2’s 35 came from one of them. We rebuilt the account around specific services.
  • Since the rebuilt campaigns went fully live in June: 21 enquiries from 848 clicks, with a conversion rate steady near 2.5%.
  • Monthly enquiries swung between 3, 7 and 5 on near-identical spend.

Fewer conversions, but real enquiries. Stable, not yet cheap.

Vigile Fire & Security

Security systems

Central Belt, Scotland · first month, September 2026

12Conversions from 491 clicks
£62.57Cost per conversion on £750.87 spend
  • Access control and door entry took 26% of the spend and produced 7 of the 12 conversions, at £28.34 each.
  • Intruder alarms (£160.21 each) and CCTV (£77.35 each) cost more, because a few broad searches drew people shopping for products rather than installers.
  • One month and 12 conversions is an early read, not a benchmark.

A strong start with one clear winner and two things to fix.

Figures are taken from our monthly and quarterly Google Ads reports, April to September 2026, with conversions as recorded in Google Ads. Results depend on sector, budget and search demand, and these accounts are not a forecast for yours.

What you receive

A PPC report you can actually read.

Every account gets a plain-English report each month and each quarter: what we did, what happened and what we recommend next. This is a cut-down extract from a real one.

Summary

September was the first month of Google Ads. The campaign generated 12 conversions from 491 clicks on total spend of £750.87, which is £62.57 per conversion. Access Control & Door Entry was the clear stand-out. Because it is the first month and the numbers are small, these figures are an early read rather than a settled benchmark.

Actions taken

  • Launched the campaign with three active ad groups.
  • Reviewed the first search terms and filtered out irrelevant ones.
  • Raised the daily budget part way through the month.

Recommendations

  1. Check the conversions against the enquiries you received before making bigger changes.
  2. Tighten the broad searches that attract browsers rather than buyers.
  3. Close off searches for competitors and do-it-yourself buyers.
  4. Hold the current approach until tracking is confirmed.

Google Ads report, September 2026

Extract from a real report (Vigile Fire & Security)
CampaignImpr.ClicksCTRConv.Conv. rateCostCPA
Security | Central Belt | Search7,9474916.18%122.44%£750.87£62.57
Ad groupImpr.ClicksCTRConv.Conv. rateCostCPA
Access Control & Door Entry1,8141307.17%75.38%£198.41£28.34
CCTV2,7451545.61%31.95%£232.04£77.35
Intruder Alarms3,3882076.11%20.97%£320.42£160.21
Each report also covers month-on-month change, the best and worst performers, and why.
Free audit + conceptNo cost, no obligation